你也学会拍脑袋了？小心拍坏了。"有人"统计过？

送交者: james_hussein_bond 于 2010-03-30, 10:09:21:

回答: 不止一篇，有人统计过，有四五百篇。你也别认为我不同意AGW，由 Amsel 于 2010-03-30, 09:44:49:

I found a list on the web
http://petesplace-peter.blogspot.com/2008/04/peer-reviewed-articles-skeptical-of-man.html
I don't know if this is what you based on. I estimate that this list contains about 200-300 links. So there are probably at most 300 articles. A large portion are comments and opinions rather than peer-reviewed articles, even though they are published on peer-reviewed journals. The rest that are indeed peer-reviewed, almost none is opposed to the AGW. They are normal scientific discourse debating the details (or interpretation of the details) of scientific discoveries.

It's like saying that papers finding that most of genetic mutations do not have an effect on evolution (whether it's correct or not), disproves the theory of evolution.

If anything, it shows that there is no conpiracy in the scientific community to block the publication of the opposing view. The opposition are just not able to produce peer-reviewed papers, only opinions.

所有跟贴:

这里有人统计过是peer reviewed 450篇(skeptist)。 - Amsel (34 bytes) 2010-03-30, 10:17:11 (427281)
- 没写完就发出去了。我的意思是这个网站的统计未必可靠， - Amsel (125 bytes) 2010-03-30, 10:23:15 (427289)
  - shit。链接到现在还没发出去。 - Amsel (185 bytes) 2010-03-30, 10:27:50 (427291)
    - 靠，这也拿得出手？ - james_hussein_bond (1386 bytes) 2010-03-30, 10:50:24 (427300)
      - 有一个不那么浪费时间的活你可以去干：去挑战CO2science里面搜集的文章， - Amsel (29 bytes) 2010-03-30, 11:41:03 (427324)
      - 它可能准确可能不准确，我自己就没当回事，连check的兴趣都没有。 - Amsel (203 bytes) 2010-03-30, 10:58:31 (427303)
        
        随便在上面抓两篇文章出来，就可以看出这个list的可笑之处。 - james_hussein_bond (903 bytes) 2010-03-30, 11:15:05 (427310)
        
        我本来没把它当回事，看了你摘的，倒发现你的错误了。 - Amsel (83 bytes) 2010-03-30, 13:06:35 (427368)
        
        那里面还有大量的发表在环境、地理、地球物理刊物上的吧？ - Amsel (77 bytes) 2010-03-30, 11:25:57 (427314)
        
        你这就是耍无赖了。我随便抓了两篇，发现一篇纯粹是胡闹,另一篇根本没有反对AGW. - james_hussein_bond (103 bytes) 2010-03-30, 11:43:16 (427327)
        
        当然没错。凡是跟斑竹有争议的话题，我说的话滴水不漏。 (无内容) - Amsel (0 bytes) 2010-03-30, 12:17:55 (427344)
        
        你承认"不止一篇，有人统计过，有四五百篇。"是错的了？ (无内容) - james_hussein_bond (0 bytes) 2010-03-30, 12:15:37 (427342)
        
        我没有警告过“里面很可能有大量的文章并不合格”？ - Amsel (59 bytes) 2010-03-30, 12:07:32 (427337)

加跟贴

又来了，对你这套车轱辘话没兴趣。 (无内容) - Amsel (0 bytes) 2010-03-30, 10:21:36 (427287)