再来审审这篇自述,不感兴趣的就不用看了呗 :)


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: Tinman 于 2014-12-06, 11:07:55:

Selfish Is Not Equal To Exclusive

PURPOSE:

To find out which side is more possible to start it in the beginning.

METHOD:

The logic is: One cannot prove anything in this situation since theoretically he shouldn’t be able to hold any evidence. Hence, what he only can do is trying to disprove the other possibility, thus the one left over is proven.

PROOF:

Based on a simple logic, if someone has the resources and the motive to do something, it will be done, somewhere at some time. There is no way to rule out the possibility by pure reasoning. The fastest way to prove that someone hasn’t done something is to prove he hasn’t had the resources, which seemingly is a dead end since both sides had them. But comparing the resources controlled by two sides, one will find out that the Mt. Sinai Team was more likely to launch the war since they had the upper hand and the result proved so. The other method is to analyze which side had the stronger motives and to compare the odds. Below is the analysis.

The Mt. Sinai Team

The strongest argument that the MST held a firm motive is that they had to send the message(s), no matter what it was, or what purpose(s) it might serve. This was probably the only motive since the other possibilities (most apparently recruiting citizens of unfriendly nations) can be ruled out by the following reasoning: First, I was nothing but a nuisance to the other side; it was just not worth the efforts it has taken. The first try (by providing a cell-phone chip as hard evidence) was flamboyantly nonprofessional, unless they had expected the CCP to retrieve the chip, which would still have been meant to send a message, though unnecessarily. The second try was inhumane. Neither of which would serve the ostensible purpose. If some people had a firm motive and only this motive, together with the overwhelming power they could summon, the chances of their undertaking actions toward their goal would be highly increased. As to the rest of the question: why was I chosen to deliver the message(s)? I will provide my reflection in the On Trivia section.

The CCP Government

Did the CCP have the motive to do it? The answer is ambiguous and subject to scrutiny. Let’s do a fact check first: Some people put a tag on me and I discovered it. If they were the CCP, there were only two possible scenarios:

A. It wasn’t their intention to let me realize that I was being tagged. The deduction is: They were astonishingly nonprofessional, as well as foolish since it wouldn’t prevent anything from happening if it’s meant to happen. What were the odds in that? And the fact is they have been doing this since the New Democratic Revolution, since when did they lose their excellence?

B. They deliberately let me realize that some people kept an eye on me so that I would behave. However, this was unnecessary and defiant, the following are the analysis. I. They had many preemptive methods but this one was too scary thus the aftermath was unpredictable. II. They could pull me back should the unwanted happen since there were always strings attached to this kite, which readily leads to the next reason. III. They would probably rather me be recruited so that they could pull me back any time and get some pieces of information, no matter what they were. IV. Stalking residents in a foreign land in such a conspicuous way was a severe challenge to the local government's sovereignty and asking for retaliation. What purpose did it serve than?

CONCLUSION:
To the CCP, it was an unbelievably foolish practice putting a tag on this guy in such a blatant way, the only result of which was making them but laughing stock. Therefore, the conclusion of the above analysis is: It is highly unlikely that the CCP started it, whereas the MST plotted the whole thing.


ON TRIVIA:

What Was Exactly The Message?
The obvious one: a methodology system;
The hidden one: a threat.

First of all, my testimony about the authenticity of the threat (whether or not THAT woman was a scarecrow) is meaningless in that I am a civilian who has no idea of the business. Yet it never matters whether such a particular female individual exists. The whole ruse is in fact a statement to the enemy: you will be retaliated if you seek for revenge. Because no one drives anyone mentally disabled without a reason. Basically it meant "we are determined to take whatever is necessary in order to protect ourselves, even it leads to human rights violation we still can get ourselves covered". It's an awe. The Jews must be scared deeply for the retaliation that followed after openly humiliated the Chinese president Hu Jin Tao, most possibly because the U.S government refused to provide protection, which made perfect sense since Mt. Sinai was coerced and paid to take the heat. This leads to but only one conclusion: I had to be dis-informationed after wards or to take a side completely which was unlikely. Otherwise the ruse would result in even heavier retaliation. It is a staged ruse, there is supposed to be a learning curve. Firstly it's a warding-off, secondly sending a scarecrow, in the end it is a demonstration. No wonder some people were so serious,because if the demo failed,the aftermath would be catastrophe.

Why Was I Chosen To Deliver?

It really didn't have to me, I was a just slightly better candidate, except for the fact that they were picking on foreigners. Though as above discussed taking side with Mt. Sinai completely was an impossible choice, in those days I was already scared off by the Chinese government by showing sympathy toward the right wing, which was the prerequisite of the deployment of the ruse. Mt. Sinai needed my trust to buy themselves time for the DIP. What made me a better candidate above the others was that I had a family history of mental diseases, which would greatly facilitate the DIP afterwards. In brief, the MST abused my sympathy and naivety.

Why Wasn’t I Checked Carrying A Knife Around?

I was literally on the edge of killing, either someone else or myself. I could even have carried a gun. This leads to but only one explanation: the MST would rather sacrifice another or more of their own so that they could have a reason to prosecute me of murder, thus to cover the scheme completely. A side dish: this conspiracy was huge.

What Was The Purpose Of Their Calling My Wife At The Number They Were Not Supposed To Know?

This question is interesting. It was indeed a small piece of evidence which could have been used as a thread to lead one out of the labyrinth had he had a strong belief system. However, at least in my case it more likely served as a decoy to avoid something unintended from happening. For example, I refused to be hospitalized but resorted to the Chinese consulate ora legal attorney etc. The fact is: I was a foreign citizen and didn’t meet the criteria to be detained for mental disturbance.

Why Have I been Being Fooled For So Long?

Because I was young and naïve, but I am learning.

Why Am I Singling Out The Mount Sinai Team And Will Never Back Off?

Background: This is a game in which no one trusts anyone anymore, especially among the sharks.

A. What are the odds for me to seek asylum from the MST? It’s downright unnecessary. B. If I did, I would be muffled completely since it would be purely damaging for their private interests, either side I might speak up with. But I have to speak up for everybody's security. C. Even if I were willing to, I could not find a single reason to vindicate them. They initiated the persecution for no good reason since I was not a citizen of this nation (on second thought, it didn't matter whether I was a citizen or not, it's purely about lucre. Because as a human being I have the same human rights as citizens, which means even citizenship cannot protect you in this country, then what makes them different from the NAZI? Or even worse, being a citizen wouldn't protect me but only hold me responsible; I would end up being no better than Snowden. Which brings to one suggestion: Could it be that through Mt. Sinai and certain foreign agency the USG not only tramples the human rights of people of other countries, but also those of citizens of its own? ); MS is anti-American. Somebody has to do something.

EPILOGUE

What’s the hidden message of this article? The title reveals it all. Don’t take exclusive action and here is a word to everybody: Human rationality triumphs. The truth goes behind you or through you, depending on whether you can handle it, or not. It boils down to one thing: What comes around goes around.




所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码: 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容: (BBCode使用说明