送交者: ak7O 于 2012-11-21, 11:32:03:

回答: then, do not talk about 'civilian' casualties 由 meiyou 于 2012-11-21, 11:02:12:

• 侵略 is hard to define, it depends on who u ask - grow up, we r talking about - meiyou (426 bytes) 2012-11-21, 12:13:36 (692209)
• That is actually the most sensible conventions at war time. - steven (346 bytes) 2012-11-21, 12:00:17 (692199)
  • 你的这个说法，是站在“参与者”的角度思考。但我们不是参与者，而是 - ak7O (72 bytes) 2012-11-21, 12:10:08 (692206)
    • you mean Geneva Conventions 很难让人接受了，这与人情相悖? - steven (124 bytes) 2012-11-21, 12:15:57 (692210)
      • 什么也不做才是旁观者，动手干预就是参与者了。参与者不必 - ak7O (251 bytes) 2012-11-21, 12:33:19 (692215)
        • Everything has its cost, no military commander does calculate - steven (255 bytes) 2012-11-21, 12:41:24 (692219)
          • 是有区别，但这区别仅存在于人们的观念之中。 (无内容) - ak7O (0 bytes) 2012-11-21, 16:31:15 (692257)
          • 911毫无疑问是恐怖袭击，与盟军对德国的轰炸毫无可比性，也与哈马斯射火箭不同 (无内容) - ASH (0 bytes) 2012-11-21, 13:47:58 (692238)
          • 站在旁观者的立场上， - ak7O (211 bytes) 2012-11-21, 13:37:18 (692236)

加跟贴